Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Spitting Some Kool-Aid Back

  • Jul. 2nd, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Rowrbazzle
07-02-09

What I’m Reading Now: Player Piano, by Kurt Vonnegut

People say to me, “Kev” (that’s what they call me back home, is “Kev”), “Kev, you are such an eternal optimist and lover of things. Tell us, though, isn’t there anything you don’t like about the stuff you love? Or are you just the blind-faith follower of pop culture like we all assume you are?”

Well, I am happy to report that, yes, in my world made up of silver linings, there are definitely some dark clouds. The thought occurred to me yesterday at the gym when a song by one of my favorite artists came up and I launched my hand toward the skip button lickedy-split. See, many, many people assume that I sit in my hammock of pop-culture daily, sipping Kool-Aid and forgiving my idols their trespasses just because they’re my idols. This is not the case! For me, it’s just more fun to accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative. In this case, “eliminate” means “delete.” From my iPod. Which I did not ten minutes after I left the gym.

But yes, deliciously for some, there is stuff I hate about the stuff I love. And today, because it’s such a perfect day, I’d like to share it with you.

Stephen King. 1. Dreamcatcher as a whole. The book starts off not bad – not great but not bad, an It-like story about four boys and their lifetime bond – and then devolves into this morass of byrus and aliens and ripley and a crazed military guy named Colonel Kurtz. No, I’m serious. Easily his most major failure in a novel, and unlike something like The Tommyknockers, which just needed some hardcore editing, there’s no real fixing Dreamcatcher.

2. “The Ten O’Clock People” – a short story in Nightmares & Dreamscapes. I don’t understand how this atrocity of fiction got published. It reads like someone doing a bad parody of what they think a Stephen King story reads like. One of the worst things I’ve ever forced myself to finish.

3. His tiring insistence on tying everything into the Dark Tower. Steve, we get it. The Tower is the nexus of everything. But while it worked well in Insomnia, I think the Dark Tower stuff was a distraction more than anything in Hearts In Atlantis, and I really, really didn’t need you tossing connections in The Colorado Kid or “Ur.” Lay off for awhile, please?

Bruce Springsteen 1. One song, every album. On every Springsteen album except for two, there is a song I just can’t stand. Greetings has “The Angel,” Magic has “Last To Die,” Tunnel of Love has “Cautious Man,” and the most egregious offender, Devils & Dust has “Silver Palomino,” his worst song ever. Imagine someone lying drunk in the corner and mumbling vowels. That’s “Silver Palomino.” (The two albums I can listen to all the way through are Born in the USA and Darkness on the Edge of Town.)

2. His fans. This I can’t lay on him, but seriously, Springsteen fans are batshit insane. According to them, Springsteen has never done anything particularly worthy since 1978, and his decision to start playing stadiums is akin to him burning babies alive for sport.

3. Backing politicians. I don’t care if I like the politicians he’s backing, I don’t want him doing it at all. I love him spouting his political opinions – I’m all for that – but backing specific people really strikes me as limiting and dangerous. And his song “Last To Die” shoehorned one of John Kerry’s political taglines poorly into a song that simply doesn’t work.

Barenaked Ladies 1. Everything has to be funny. This got more intense in later years, when they began doing more serious songs with more frequency. The absolute worst came in the song “Pinch Me,” a terrific little song about suburban ennui, which threw in the line, “I just made you say underwear.” Sure, it’s goofy fourth-grade fun, but the song didn’t need it and was damaged by it. See also “Adrift,” “Something You’ll Never Find,” etc. We get it, BNL, you’re hilarious Canadians. Now calm it.

2. Splitting up the group. I’m not saying I won’t listen to their new album, but Steve Page seems so integral to the group that it’s going to be completely different without him. I think it was a mistake to split up, seemingly because of Page’s big cocaine scandal.

Chuck Taylors 1. Two-tongues sneakers. Seriously, Chucks, what the fuck? Why do we need two tongues on our sneakers? It seems like the sneaker equivalent of popped collars. It’s ridiculous and it looks stupid. But not as stupid as

2. One-Stars. This knockoff of the normal brand is such an offense to the eye it’s hard to look at it. It looks like it was manufactured in the back of a van.

Dr Pepper 1. Diet Cherry Chocolate Dr Pepper. I still can’t get over how grody this soda was. I mean, I like chocolate Coke. Why is this so absolutely vile?

2. Berries & Crème. Cough syrup in a Dr Pepper bottle. This was like Moxie if Moxie was even grosser.

Disney 1. The Sword in the Stone. I am appalled this movie exists. It’s called The Sword in the Stone, but neither the sword nor the stone appear until literally the last ten minutes of the film, and neither does the indication that they are in any way important. Plus, the movie is just a mis-mash of bizarre vignettes that add up to so much of nothing.

2. Fantasmic. This show is maybe my favorite fireworks spectacular in the parks, and is the favorite of many. But as a way to save some pennies, they reduced the show from nightly to two or three nights a week. Worse, no one knows what those nights are going to be in advance, so it’s practically impossible to plan a Disney vacation with Fantasmic in it.

3. Inflated inflation. Disney has a pattern of raising the price of theme park admission every August, no matter what. Chances are good that they’re going to do it again this August, which is a little beyond the pale.

Star Trek. 1. Ferengi episodes. Especially “Profit and Lace,” easily the worst thing with the Star Trek name on it. Note, though, that when Ferengis are given actual stories beyond just, “Isn’t Ferengi society hilarious?,” they’re fine. Usually.

2. Picard’s sometimes a total wuss. No, you don’t need to fucking communicate with the Crystalline Entity. It killed like a zillion people, Picard. You don’t reason with the fucking Death Star, you just kill it.

3. Enterprise and at least half of Voyager. Voyager definitely had some kick-ass episodes, especially when they brought Seven of Nine on and the show had three and a half good actors instead of just two and a half. But Enterprise was an abortion of bloat and poor concepts.

Starbucks
1. Price. It’s a little cliché to complain about beverage prices at Starbucks, but seriously. I pay it, but I don’t always like it.

2. The neverending coffee smell. If you’re there for any length of time, your clothes end up reeking of burnt coffee smell. Which is awesome if you don’t like coffee.

Now, here’s where you come in. Have I ever bored you with my incessant talk about how awesome something is? Chances are, there’s something I can’t stand about it. Throw something at me and I’ll let you know.

Tomorrow, if I’m up for it: Stuff I Love About Stuff I Hate.

Kev

Comments

( 112 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]quirkstreet wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 04:12 pm (UTC)
Yeah, "I just made you say underwear" is one of the things I can recall about that song years later, and it's not a good thing. The song would have been better off without.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:52 pm (UTC)
Exactly. And it's not like they shouldn't BE funny. They have a lot of really terrific funny songs. What I hate is when they take a good, serious song and feel a need to inject it with inappropriate humor.
[info]delmarmar wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 04:32 pm (UTC)
I like my One Star clothes! I admit I've been tempted by double tongued Chucks not because I like double tongues but because I have slim feet and I think the extra space the second tongue takes up will make them fit better. But until I find a clearance pair really cheap I'm not buying.

HAHAHA, *$ smells like coffee!

I read Nightmares & Dreamscapes and totally don't recall that story. Guess it was that bad.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:05 pm (UTC)
It's not the smell of coffee, it's the lingering stench on my clothes!

I just ... is that why they're doing the double-tongue? I don't know, it seems ooky and bizarre.

When I read N&D now, I skip over that and "My Pretty Pony," which is awful but not an abortion.
(no subject) - [info]delmarmar - Jul. 2nd, 2009 08:07 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]joezer - Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:24 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]delmarmar - Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:36 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:44 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]delmarmar - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:06 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:12 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]joezer - Jul. 3rd, 2009 04:38 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 05:08 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]joezer - Jul. 4th, 2009 05:08 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 4th, 2009 05:31 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]delmarmar - Jul. 3rd, 2009 12:23 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:05 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]joezer - Jul. 4th, 2009 05:06 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 4th, 2009 05:31 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]delmarmar - Jul. 4th, 2009 01:30 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]joezer - Jul. 4th, 2009 05:31 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:44 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]joezer - Jul. 3rd, 2009 04:40 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 05:06 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]joezer - Jul. 4th, 2009 05:10 am (UTC) Expand
[info]manley1 wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 04:36 pm (UTC)
Kev, you are such an eternal optimist and lover of things.

I love when you make up dialogue.

"Profit and Lace" doesn't hold a candle to the badness of "This Way to Eden" from TOS. Space hippies take over the Enterprise. Sure! Pass the peyote for hope of enjoyment!

I don't think that trying to communicate with an intelligent life form before blowing it up is a sign of wussiness. In fact, I think it's the exact opposite. Plus, it's consistent with the sensibilities of that series, which was to seek out, not just blow up, life.

Enterprise did get better as the series progressed, especially in seasons 3 and 4 when the original production crew was sidelined. Like DS9, you saw actual continuity when the ship was damaged and it was a bona fide problem, unlike Voyager where magic healed the ship weekly to showroom condition. It just suffered from too few ideas.

Complaining about the coffee smell in Starbucks is like working out at a gym and complaining about the smell of sweat. For those of us who love coffee, it's actually a good thing. :-)
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 04:58 pm (UTC)
I would be okay with the crystalline entity thing if Picard hadn't been shown time after time that it was not misunderstood or misunderstanding, but violently, consciously evil.

And don't get me wrong; I love the smell of coffee. LOVE IT. Just not the burnt coffee stench on my clothes that never comes out.
(no subject) - [info]manley1 - Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:42 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:03 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]jodfoster wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 04:48 pm (UTC)
I am also annoyed by the coffee smell at sbux. But hey, I am sipping my free berfday drink via the *$ gold card :) So I do like that part!
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:13 pm (UTC)
OMG OMG OMG HAPPY BIRTHDAY! YOU ARE HAPPY AND FUN!!! Jeez, I wish I had a cupcake to send you!
[info]popebuck1 wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 04:57 pm (UTC)
1. Yeah, The Sword In The Stone sucks pretty bad. It's from that period right before Walt died, when he was totally focusing on the theme park and on live-action movies like Mary Poppins, and had pretty much left the animation unit to others. Plus it was after they had switched from the painstaking hand-drawn style beloved by Walt to the cheaper Xerography process, which worked great for 101 Dalmatians but didn't do much of a service to either The Sword In The Stone or The Jungle Book. In short, it marks the point when Disney feature animation started wandering in the wilderness. You could argue that there are worse ones, especially recently - Atlantis and Treasure Planet spring to mind, with their storytelling-by-marketing-department - but The Sword In The Stone is special because it's when Disney's animation jumped the shark.

2. I never really watched Voyager or Enterprise, and in fact gave up on Deep Space Nine halfway through, so all of my favorite "worst Trek episodes" are from Next Generation. The worst for me was always "Sub Rosa," where Trek tries to do a Gothic-style Harlequin romance with bizarre results. This episode also proves why so few of the stories focused on Beverly. She was great as a supporting character and a foil/possible romantic interest for Picard, but floundered helplessly when forced into the starring role. There are also a couple of Troi episodes that I detest, and then there's that one where the Enterprise turns into a pre-Columbian temple and they never do explain how or why, exactly. But "Sub Rosa" takes the prize for me.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:17 pm (UTC)
The thing is, the vignette thing doesn't HAVE to suck. Jungle Book was pretty good, not perfect, and I stand by my love of Robin Hood. But Sword in the Stone just sticks out like an awful sore thumb.

As for later ones - man, I wanted to love Atlantis so much. I managed to see that and Treasure Planet in the theaters, but skip Lilo and Stitch. Ug.

Thankfully, Bolt was very promising, and I am absolutely looking forward to Princess and the Frog and Rapunzel.

Deep Space Nine is my favorite show of all time. They managed to make Klingon episodes interesting, something that TNG could never do for me. But it did have some flaws, mostly involving Ferengis. And ho boy, did "Sub Rosa" suck ass.
(no subject) - [info]phoenix_down711 - Jul. 2nd, 2009 10:11 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:00 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - (Anonymous) - Jul. 3rd, 2009 05:38 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]popebuck1 - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:58 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:20 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]popebuck1 - Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:54 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:11 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]bear_left - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:17 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:22 am (UTC) Expand
[info]jkusters wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:12 pm (UTC)
BNL: I have a concert that they did shortly after the break up. Kevin Hearn is now singing many of the Steven Paige stuff. And it just doesn't work. The worst track is Shopping, and it's so bad...

Star Trek: The first three seasons of Enterprise are pretty poor. The fourth season was actually good, IMHO (not counting the final episode). If all four seasons had been as strong as the fourth, it would have made seven years with no problem.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:18 pm (UTC)
I kind of WANT to give it a chance. I mean, Kevin did co-write "Shopping." But there's a reason why Steve took over "Sound of Your Voice."

You know, I did see some eps of season 4 I really liked. I wish there had been more like that. And unlike the final episode.
(no subject) - [info]bear_left - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:19 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:23 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]bear_left - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:30 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:39 am (UTC) Expand
[info]thetathx1138 wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:19 pm (UTC)
"Voyager" was an abysmal pit of suck from beginning to end. "Enterprise" started out awful but improved once Manny Coto hopped on as showrunner. One or two episodes were very much TOS, which I loved.

The theme song, though, can go suck a fuck. Whoever approved that needs to be shot and their corpse used as a combination jizz-catcher/toilet.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:19 pm (UTC)
I don't know, I really liked some self-contained episodes of Voyager, the one Trek show that works better in reruns.

And oh Jesus, that song. FUCKING SONG.
[info]raysimoto wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:20 pm (UTC)
You shut up! I love my One Stars! They're pink! And suede! And I LOVE THEM!
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:21 pm (UTC)
OMG GET REAL SNEAKERS. One Stars do not deserve your love!!! ;)
(no subject) - [info]raysimoto - Jul. 2nd, 2009 09:41 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:13 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jss1113 - Jul. 3rd, 2009 01:50 am (UTC) Expand
[info]ericdabear wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:23 pm (UTC)
Here's a hate / love thing perhaps:

http://imgur.com/5dkGc.gif
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:43 pm (UTC)
I don't know that! What is it?!
(no subject) - [info]phoenix_down711 - Jul. 2nd, 2009 10:06 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:03 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]son_of_ottie wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:32 pm (UTC)
But...I LOVE Dreamcatcher, The Movie! (Except when Morgan Freeman says, EMINENT instead of IMMINENT!!! I could rip his arm off and beat him to death with it!)
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:22 pm (UTC)
I thought the movie, like the book, was going along really well until the shit-weasels came in.
(no subject) - [info]son_of_ottie - Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:52 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:03 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]son_of_ottie - Jul. 3rd, 2009 08:52 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 10:34 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]geometrician wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:39 pm (UTC)
So I've always found an homoerotic sort of boy-bonding thing in Stephen King's writing. Thoughts?
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:23 pm (UTC)
It's a baby boomer thing, I think. If the straight baby boomer guys weren't as comfortable about male bonding, we'd never have gotten GenX bromances.

I totally agree.
[info]arie wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:43 pm (UTC)
2. Fantasmic. Tell me about it! It's my very favorite and we're actually skipping it this year b/c there's no way we could logically make it with the schedule they put out for it while we're there. I'm bummed.

2. Picard’s sometimes a total wuss. I only ever watched that crystalline entity episode once because it was so stupid and made me so mad at the level of stupid. And that's saying something since Star Trek, while a franchise that I love, is pretty full of stupid. Usually it's in a good way, though.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:24 pm (UTC)
Star Trek has its bouts of stupid. You love it like you love a three-legged dog, sometimes.

I've switched my loyalty to IllumiNations, I think. Which is so viable.
(no subject) - [info]popebuck1 - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:17 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]low_fat_muffin wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:45 pm (UTC)
I've never read dreamcatcher but saw the movie - and I thought the movie was a pretty cool story (smartest alien living in a disabled human host - and the whole play of the alien inside the head in the library thing was uber-cool).

[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:25 pm (UTC)
That's the thing about Dreamcatcher/i>: it has great IDEAS. It's just getting them across was ... tough. The brain-library concept was a revisitation of an idea King used in The Regulators, and it was so awesome there.
[info]low_fat_muffin wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 05:46 pm (UTC)
Everytime Janeway spoke I was like "WILL SOMEONE ASSIMILATE HER - FOR CHRISTSSAKE SHUT HER UP!"
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:26 pm (UTC)
HA HA HA HA. I liked her, most of the time. Especially when she literally let her hair down and unclenched.
(no subject) - [info]bear_left - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:21 am (UTC) Expand
[info]lz1982 wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:00 pm (UTC)
I didn't mind "The Ten O'Clock People." I mean, I didn't love it, but I didn't think it was an abomination. I did remember you hating it.

Couldn't finish Dreamcatcher--and you forgot the psychic retarded guy!

Re. Starbucks prices: For specialty drinks, yes. But their basic coffees and teas are around the same price as Dunkin' Donuts. People are always surprised to learn my grande iced tea costs $1.80.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:28 pm (UTC)
I actually didn't mind Duddits. I just hated the alien/government stuff.

Oh MAN do I hate "The Ten O'Clock People."

You know, because I don't drink coffee, I didn't actually know that. Ha-HA, nay-sayers.
(no subject) - [info]lz1982 - Jul. 2nd, 2009 06:38 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]bearpawly wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 07:03 pm (UTC)
Keepin' it real!

I knew I'd see "Cautious Man" in there...
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 07:07 pm (UTC)
Oh, always! ;)

Edited at 2009-07-02 07:07 pm (UTC)
[info]gryphons_hole wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 07:36 pm (UTC)
You completely skipped comic books. I want to know the aspects and/or story arcs you absolutely hate about your favorite characters...
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:11 pm (UTC)
Original-universe Spider-Man has a huge long history that's sort of difficult to follow, and recently they reset his character so that he doesn't remember ever being married and the world is all different. It's ... unsettling, especially because Spidey is how I got into comics.

I have a big, big problem with a lot of Golden Age and Silver Age comics. I recognize the importance of them, but they're so quaint I can't really take most of them seriously. Unlike other "classic media" - movies, some TV shows, music, radio shows - my love of comics doesn't really start until the 1970s.

The biggest problem is my favorite guy, Daredevil. If you recommend him, people are going to go out of their way to seek out the "best." Well, Frank Miller did two legendary runs on the title, and he earns the title of legendary. But before he wrote it, he DREW it, and while his art is amazing, the stories they paired with it were atrocious. But because of the art, those stories are collected in the Frank Miller Daredevil anthologies, and I've known people to give up on the character because of how bad those first stories are.

Plus? Most people don't know how to write compelling Green Arrow stories, and it pisses me off.
(no subject) - [info]gryphons_hole - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:34 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 12:55 am (UTC) Expand
[info]neild wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 09:19 pm (UTC)
I love this whole thing. It's great to know there are things that prevent your life from being totally awesome; otherwise, you would be completely insufferable.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:12 pm (UTC)
Not EVERYTHING is awesome. Mostly. ;)
[info]paterson_si wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 10:44 pm (UTC)
So there is a NO list after all. :)
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:12 pm (UTC)
Of course. Life would be super boring if there weren't. ;)
(no subject) - [info]paterson_si - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:18 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]throwdownartist wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:54 pm (UTC)
I very much look forward to the day when I can tell people: "Kevin Quigley? That SOB sold out way back in 2008. He just hasn't been the same since."

While manaically following all your books and boring all my friends with karaoke stories, of course.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:33 am (UTC)
I am constantly amused by the haters who nevertheless obsess over Springsteen and King. I can't wait to be the guy who gets adoridicule.
(no subject) - [info]throwdownartist - Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:46 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:48 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]joezer wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:42 am (UTC)
Disney
Sword in the Stone ~ Been forever since I've seen this...if I ever did aside from snippets here and there on television. If I remember the basic story concept, it's basically Arthur, son of Uther Pendragon, in his early years before becoming King Arthur. So...epic story dabbled, snipped, and cosmetically altered by Disney storytelling while Walt himself was otherwise unable to oversee production.

Inflated Inflation ~ The uptick in pricing didn't use to happen as "fast" in years of yore. But, yeah, it has been trickling upwards faster more and more for both ticket prices and parking (for those day-trippers who aren't Annual Pass holders or Guests staying in one of the resort's hotels). Yeah...I remember when tickets were less than $35 and parking was between one-third to one-half the price it is now.



[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:48 am (UTC)
Sigh. And for that cheaper price, you got Horizons and all that other stuff.

Still, no DHS or Animal Kingdom, so I suppose there's some tradeoff.
(no subject) - [info]joezer - Jul. 3rd, 2009 04:42 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 05:06 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]joezer - Jul. 4th, 2009 05:08 am (UTC) Expand
[info]bear_left wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:25 am (UTC)
I'm pausing Kung Fu Panda in the dvd player to post to your LJ. How meta-Kev. And I will have to bring the copy of A Bear's Life on Sat....

(And maybe my brain is just this warped by now, but I keep thinking they must have met you before writing this script, and written it just for you)

I'm still not sold that "Last to Die" is so bad, but "Cautious Man," yeah, not so impressive. Was just playing Tunnel of Love & that was either the only song or one of just two songs I didn't bother to rip onto my laptop.

[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:30 am (UTC)
I keep forgetting you're a Springsteen guy.

A lot of people don't like the song "Spare Parts," but I'm really into it. Tunnel is, strangely, my favorite album, even though "Cautious Man" is so bothersome.

"Last To Die" should be okay, but I really don't care for the enunciation: "Last to die for UH mis-TAKE." Seeing it live made me like it LESS.

Dude, we should see a Springsteen show together.

And yes. Kung Fu Panda is all for me. Whee!
(no subject) - [info]bear_left - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:33 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:40 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]bear_left - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:43 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:45 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]bear_left - Jul. 3rd, 2009 04:00 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 04:12 am (UTC) Expand
[info]wyrmwoud wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:33 am (UTC)
OMG YOU GET ALL DEFENSIVE EVERY TIME I SNIFF MY NOSE UP AT DREAMCATCHER!!!

Seriously, the only other Stephen King novel I've ever stopped reading was DElores Claiborne, but that was only because I couldn't take reading the accent. I hope to try it again someday.

I still think Tommyknockers gets a bad rap. But maybe I should try reading it again as well.

Enterprise also had some good ideas... I keep trying to watch episodes dealing with the Time War or whatever. It just sucks.
[info]kev_bot wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 03:37 am (UTC)
I know. I was wrong about Dreamcatcher. You were right!

Dolores Claiborne is one of my favorites, but it took me a bit to get into it. Once I did, though, MAN.

My third read of Tommyknockers was the most revealing - I got under the layers of unneeded stuff and got the meat of the story. I just wish there was more of it.

I think I need to give Enterprise season 4 another try. Maybe.

Edited at 2009-07-03 03:38 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]wyrmwoud - Jul. 3rd, 2009 04:44 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wyrmwoud - Jul. 3rd, 2009 04:50 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 05:07 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kev_bot - Jul. 3rd, 2009 05:07 am (UTC) Expand
[info]bfirrera wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 04:48 pm (UTC)
re: Fantasmic

It may possibly be my favorite of the end of night spectaculars. That said:

Dropping the amount of shows is playing havoc with tour planning. You may or may not get to see the show during your trip. When it was daily (or multiple times daily during busier times), you could plan to go any night of the week (or park hop to Studios any night of the week) and know you'd get to see the show. Now, you have to pick either a Monday or a Thursday (though some other nights may have a "surprise" showing if the crowd levels get too high in the park). The crowds on the nights that the show is running are HORRIBLE (since so many more people during the week have to be crushed in for those two nights where they would normally be spread out over the week) and it's also near impossible to get sit-down dinner reservations at the better restaurants (or at least at the better ONE credit sit-down restaurants) because so many of the people going have the dinner plan (which can be used towards the "Fantasmic Dinner Package" (which isn't actually that great a deal, 'cause the seating for the package is less than stellar WAY over at the far stage left)). I've heard that the people now trying to get reservations for the nights in September/October (when they are offering FREE dining plan) are really making this tough.

---
Now, even though it's my favorite show and even if they returned to nightly showings...I'm going to say something possibly controversial: I don't particularly care for the "Pocahontas" sequence in this show. Why? Because it doesn't fit in with the theming of dreams/magic of the rest of the show (since it's based on real people, no matter HOW "Disney-fied").

When the show premiered (three years after the California version), at the behest of Michael Eisner, the Pocahontas sequence replaced a sequence with Peter Pan simply because he wanted more "new" movies in it (and Pocahontas had been released at the time only the year before). NOW it's fifteen years old, which unfortunately has made even THIS sequence dated.

It's always felt shoe-horned in to me, especially since the whole show was obviously designed to be modular (let's face it, the trio of singing princess/prince duos could easily be rearranged depending on the popularity of a particular princess at any given time) and any staged sequence could be swapped out for another (with possibly the Snow Queen/Witch and Maleficent sequences being truly the only ones that should never be removed), keeping it in the show for so long has always puzzled me.

I'd love to see them rehab the show and put the Peter Pan sequence into the Florida show (I think that putting the classic characters in make the show feel, ironically, LESS dated than putting in a particular group from a current show, the oldest Disney characters are timeless, where some of the most recent characters may not have that same longevity (just look at such recent "classics" as Treasure Planet, Home on the Range, Chicken Little, etc.)...as long as it's not ANOTHER set of Pixar characters (don't get me wrong...I love the Pixar movies, but I'm afraid we're all going to be suffering a bit of Pixar fatigue since so many of the newest attractions feature those characters...).

( 112 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

November 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Research

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Kenn Wislander